NPR’s Ayesha Rascoe asks researcher Kimberly Bertrand about hair relaxers containing formaldehyde and strikes by the FDA to ban them.
AYESHA RASCOE, HOST:
Folks use hair relaxers for a lot of causes – for day-to-day comfort or simply actually liking the best way it seems. However final 12 months, one in every of our company cautioned in opposition to utilizing hair relaxers and chemical straighteners.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED NPR BROADCAST)
ALEXANDRA WHITE: Frequent customers of the hair-straightening merchandise – that they had about over double the chance of uterine most cancers in comparison with ladies who didn’t say they’d used these merchandise.
RASCOE: And now the Meals and Drug Administration is proposing to ban hair relaxers containing a chemical known as formaldehyde, which is a identified carcinogen. Kimberly Bertrand is an affiliate professor of medication at Boston College College of Drugs. She joins us now for extra. Welcome to this system.
KIMBERLY BERTRAND: Thanks. Completely happy to be right here.
RASCOE: So what can we find out about this proposed ban by the FDA?
BERTRAND: Yeah. So the FDA has proposed a ban particularly limiting a selected ingredient known as formaldehyde that is been utilized in some hair relaxers and different hair merchandise. Formaldehyde is a identified human carcinogen, which means it has been labeled as a cancer-causing agent. And the chemical can also have short-term results when inhaled – irritation of the eyes, nostril, pores and skin, and throat. It will possibly exacerbate bronchial asthma, may cause bother respiration. So along with most cancers, there’s different considerations about this explicit chemical. The attention-grabbing factor is that the FDA’s centered particularly on formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing merchandise, however that does not essentially cowl different potential poisonous substances which might be included or current in chemical hair relaxers.
RASCOE: What else is in there that is likely to be deemed dangerous?
BERTRAND: So it is actually troublesome to know, in some methods, as a result of the entire totally different firms, their formulations for these merchandise are proprietary. So you do not essentially know the extent of all the pieces that is in there. However off-the-shelf testing has demonstrated that these merchandise include issues like heavy metals, which might accumulate within the physique over time, they usually can act each as carcinogens and have estrogen-like results. After which the opposite ones that we’re notably involved about are chemical compounds often known as endocrine disruptors, and these are chemical compounds that may both mimic estrogen or have anti-estrogen properties within the physique. And so for any kind of hormonally pushed most cancers, like uterine most cancers and breast most cancers and ovarian most cancers, these are the chemical class that we’re kind of most involved about.
So typically you may see on the label chemical – lengthy chemical names that finish within the phrase paraben, and typically you may see different lengthy chemical names that finish within the phrase phthalate, otherwise you may see an abbreviation like DEP, which stands for diethyl phthalate. The difficulty is that, , whereas some producers could checklist these substances, they don’t seem to be really required to checklist them particularly, and these chemical compounds could solely be listed on the label as perfume or preservatives. So it may be actually onerous to know what you are getting once you’re, , choosing up these merchandise. After which when you are going to the salon, you actually do not know.
RASCOE: Is proposing a ban on utilizing formaldehyde as an ingredient in hair relaxers sufficient?
BERTRAND: I feel a ban on formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing merchandise might have a very essential impact on the well being of customers and salon employees, for instance, who could breathe in these merchandise once they’re launched into the air.
RASCOE: You might have mentioned that the – {that a} transfer to ban formaldehyde in hair relaxers is an environmental justice problem. What do you imply by that?
BERTRAND: These merchandise are closely marketed to Black ladies particularly. They’re utilized by Black ladies orders of magnitude greater than amongst white ladies, for instance. On the similar time, we additionally know that there are essential racial disparities in most cancers outcomes for Black ladies in comparison with white ladies on this nation. Black ladies usually tend to die from breast most cancers than white ladies. They’re extra prone to die from uterine most cancers than white ladies. And so we’re coping with this racial disparity in illness, and but we even have this publicity that’s predominantly skilled by Black ladies. The truth that we’ve this chemical publicity that hasn’t been strictly regulated is doubtlessly an essential think about these disparities.
RASCOE: Kimberly Bertrand is an affiliate professor of medication at Boston College College of Drugs. Thanks a lot for becoming a member of us.
BERTRAND: Thanks, Ayesha.
Copyright © 2023 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This textual content might not be in its closing type and could also be up to date or revised sooner or later. Accuracy and availability could range. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.
